What truly, deeply, need to be said, need to be put to words, need to be conveyed in a language that can be understood?
And that question in itself is being questioned by itself.
The meaning is, for those that this questions exists, the question is not needed; it is already flowering as a quality of exploration and truth in action. And for those that that question is absent, the words are probably, most probably, will not awaken the quality of the question itself.
So the question is asked: what is worth put to words? What is worth being said, being conveyed in words, being transferred in a language that can be understood, where the very language stands, most often than not, on the way of true, natural, organic, and even infinite exploration?
Maybe paradoxical expressions are somewhat pointing to that because they cannot be digested through word processing. They require a deeper, or a higher, or a vaster hovering in their space, the space of the paradox, if it's a true paradox, not invented or fake one.
The quality of that invites a certain presence in it that is longer, deeper, higher, vaster than just digestion of words. Maybe that's a pointer worth looking at. For now, the question itself is that paradox, as it is explained, for those that the question is real, it is not needed to be said in words. And for those that it is not real, it is very most likely not going to help them transcend through the words to the question.
